|
Pharmacogn Res. 2022; 14(1):5-11 A Multifaceted Journal in the field of Natural Products and Pharmacognosy www.phcogres.com | www.phcog.net |
Original Article |
Preliminary Assessment of Glycemic Control and Body Fat Reduction Effects of Terminalia chebula Retz. Extract on Pre-diabetic Subjects
Sansanee Sombattera1, Bunleu Sungthong2, Prasoborn Rinthong2,*
Sansanee Sombattera1, Bunleu Sungthong2, Prasoborn Rinthong2,*
1Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahasarakham University, Maha Sarakham, THAILAND.
2Pharmaceutical Chemistry and Natural Product Research Unit, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahasarakham University, Maha Sarakham, THAILAND.
Correspondence
Dr. Prasoborn Rinthong
Pharmaceutical Chemistry and Natural Product Research Unit, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahasarakham University, Maha Sarakham-44150, THAILAND.
Email id: prasoborn.r@msu.ac.th
History
• Submission Date: 26-08-2021;
• Review completed: 29-09-2021;
• Accepted Date: 01-11-2021
DOI : 10.5530/pres.14.1.2
Article Available online
http://www.phcogres.com
Copyright
© 2022 Phcog.Net. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
ABSTRACT
Background: Terminalia chebula Retz. (Combretaceae) is a medicinal herb using in traditional medicine worldwide and has hypoglycemic effects in animal models. Objectives: The present study was a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial designed to study the effect of T. chebula fruit water extract (TFWE) in pre-diabetic subjects. The efficacy of TFWE and placebo were compared in terms of reducing fasting blood sugar (FBS) levels, body mass indexes (BMI), body circumferences and skinfold thicknesses. Adverse events of TFWE intervention were also investigated. Materials and Methods: TFWE was phytochemically quantitated by HPLC analysis and its inhibitory action on alpha-glucosidase. In a clinical study, 80 pre-diabetic healthy subjects were classified according to BMI as normal weight and overweight and each group was further divided into 2 groups. The treatment group received 2 capsules of TFWE 500 mg, 2 times per day, before meals for 8 weeks and the control group received 2 placebo capsules, taken orally as the treatment group. Data was collected at week 0, 4 and 8 of the study. Results: For overweight participants receiving TFWE, the mean FBS levels were significantly lower than that of the placebo group (p = 0.026) at week 8. Visceral fat levels also showed a significant reduction (p = 0.039) compared to the placebo group. TFWE dispensation did not show serious adverse events. Conclusion: The administration of 2,000 mg TFWE per day was considered safe for the pre-diabetic healthy subjects with benefits in obesity management.
Key words: Terminalia, Diabetes, Fasting blood sugar, Obesity, Visceral fat.
Cite this article: Sombattera S, Sungthong B, Rinthong P. Preliminary Assessment of Glycemic Control and Body Fat Reduction Effects of Terminalia chebula Retz. Extract on Pre-diabetic Subjects. Pharmacog Res. 2022;14(1):5-11.
INTRODUCTION
Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) remain one of the leading causes of death worldwide that killed approximately 40 million people each year.[1] The World Health Organization’s global action plan for the prevention and control of NCDs targets to reduce by 25% relative overall mortality from four main types of NCDs (cardiovascular diseases, cancers, diabetes and chronic respiratory diseases) by 2025.[2] Diabetes is recognized as a serious, chronic metabolic disease that has a significant impact on individual quality of life and mortality. In recent decades, the prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) has dramatically increased in all countries and obesity has been projected to be a driving factor of the T2D epidemic.[3,4] The management of pre-diabetes and preventing progression to T2D are therefore urgently needed for public health approaches.
Terminalia chebula Retz. (Combretaceae) or black myrobalan is one of the most revered medicinal plants in Ayurvedic medicine and folk remedies worldwide. It is called the “king of medicines” due to its use in the prevention and treatment of many kinds of diseases.[5] The ripe fruit of T. chebula has been shown to have a wide range of pharmacological actions including antibacterial, anticancer, antidiabetic, adaptogenic, hepatoprotective and improvement of gastrointestinal motility.[6-8] In addition, T. chebula fruit water extract (TFWE) showed hypoglycemic effects in the diabetes-induced rats at an oral dose of 200 mg/kg body weight.[9,10] In 3T3-L1 adipocyte experiments, TFWE demonstrated the anti-adipogenic and antilipolytic properties that inhibited adipocyte differentiation and lipid accumulation.[11] Oral administrations of TFWE at 5,000 mg/kg body weight single dose or 1,200 mg/kg body weight continuously dose for 270 days did not produce signs of toxicity in rats.[12,13] These experimental evidence suggest that TFWE could be a potential antidiabetic agent. However, the essentially clinical data of TFWE to prevent T2D progression has not been established. In the present study, a double-blind clinical trial was carried out to study the effect of TFWE in pre-diabetes subjects. The primary objectives were to study and compare the efficacy of TFWE and placebo in terms of reducing fasting blood sugar (FBS) levels, body mass index (BMI), body circumference and skinfold thickness. The secondary outcome was to investigate the adverse events of an oral TFWE intervention.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TFWE Preparation
Dry ripe fruits of T. chebula were purchased from Thong-in Herbal drug store located in Maha Sarakham, Thailand on May 2019 and identified by Assist. Prof. Prasob-orn Rinthong, Pharmaceutical Chemistry and Natural Product Research Unit, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahasarakham University, Maha Sarakham, Thailand. The voucher specimens of T. chebula fruits (MSU.PH-COM-TC05) were deposited at Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahasarakham University, Maha Sarakham, Thailand. The plant material was ground to a fine powder and 3 kg powder was subjected to extraction with distilled water 50 L at 100°C for 1 hr. The filtrate was evaporated to dry powder using a spray-dryer. The resulting TFWE was analyzed phytochemical quantitativly using HPLC according to a previously published method.[14]
Alpha-glucosidase enzyme assay
The alpha-glucosidase enzymatic reaction assay was performed using p-nitrophenyl-β-glucopyranoside (pNPG) as a substrate in phosphate buffer according to a previously described method.[15] Briefly, different concentrations of solutions of the extract were added into phosphate buffer (pH 6.8). After adding the glucosidase enzyme, the reaction mixture was incubated at 37°C for 5 min. pNPG solution was added and incubated at 37oC for 20 min. Sodium carbonate solution was added to terminate the reaction. The absorbance of the p-nitrophenol was measured at 405 nm and the percentage of enzymatic activity was calculated and the inhibitory action of TFWE was expressed as IC50.
Drug preparation and dosage calculation
TFWE and placebo were placed in opaque white hard gelatin capsules. The capsules contained 500 mg of either TFWE or corn starch. Weight variation and disintegration tests of TFWE and placebo capsules were conducted using the methods in United States Pharmacopeia 40.[16] The TFWE dosage for this study was calculated from the published TFWE oral antihyperglycemic effective dose in rats and a factor method applied as an exponent of body surface area to convert doses in animals for humans.[9,17] Thus, the estimated dose of TFWE was determined to be 2,000 mg per day.
Clinical study design and ethics
A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted at the Outpatient Department, Si Chiang Mai Hospital, Si Chiang Mai District, Nong Khai, Thailand, during December 2019 to May 2020. The entire study was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki and the International Conference on Harmonization Tripartite Guideline on Good Clinical Practice. The trial protocol and informed consent form were approved by the Ethics Committee for Human Research Mahasarakham University (No.115/2562) and the Ethical Committee of Nong Khai Provincial Public Health Office, Thailand (No.7/2562).
Participants
The subjects, 125 of them, were screened based on the inclusion criteria of (i) aged between 35-60 years, (ii) had given written consent, (iii) were examined and assessed to be healthy after clinical examination by physician, (iv) had FBS level between 100-125 mg/dL and (v) a BMI 18.5-29.9 kg/m2. Subjects were excluded if they (i) were on medications or consumed herbals/natural products that could interfere with glucose absorption/produce hyperglycemia, (ii) had history of allergy with herbals or natural products, (iii) were pregnant or breast feeding. All subjects provided written informed consent to participate prior to commencing any study-related activities. The subjects who met the inclusion criteria were recruited in the study and were allocated by simple randomization into 2 parallel groups (TFWE or placebo). All participants were able to withdraw at any time during the study.
Intervention and outcome measurements
Participants were instructed to take 2 capsules of TFWE or placebo twice daily before meals for a 8-week period. They had health education and maintained their usual diet, and were not allowed to consume functional foods or dietary supplements. Compliance was monitored by collecting and counting the remaining capsules. Outcome measurements including FBS, BMI, body circumferences (arm, waist, hip and thigh) and skinfold thickness (chest, abdomen, suprailiac, thigh and triceps) were assessed before and after taking the intervention products for 4 and 8 weeks. The participants were also required to record the adverse events and report them to the investigators.
Statistical Analysis
The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 23.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
TFWE preparation and alpha-glucosidase activity
The obtained TFWE was a dry brownish powder. The HPLC analysis showed that gallic acid was a major phenolic compound with 33.23±0.857 mg/g of TFWE, followed by chebulinic acid, chebulagic acid and ellagic acid as 13.12±0.303, 10.43±0.080 and 3.60±0.096 mg/g of TFWE, respectively. The in vitro alpha-glucosidase inhibitory assay to confirm the preventive effect on carbohydrate digestion showed that TFWE was a strong alpha-glucosidase inhibitor as the IC50 was 10.6±0.30 µg/mL as compared to the IC50 of standard acarbose at 2.8±0.16 mg/mL.
Baseline demographic and physical characteristics of participants
A total of 82 subjects were recruited in this study and they were classified according to their BMI as normal weight range (BMI 18.5-24.9) and overweight (BMI 25.0-29.9) participants (Figure 1). Eighty participants completed the study. Two participants in the normal weight range group were lost during follow up. Table 1 shows the demographic and physical characteristics of all trial participants. In both normal weight and overweight participants, the participants who received TFWE and placebo showed no statistically significant differences (p> 0.05) in age, sex, family history related to diabetes, allergic history and blood pressure. Additionally the mean BMI, FBS, body circumference, skinfold thickness and visceral fat levels of participants did not show a significantly difference (p> 0.05) within the normal weight and the overweight groups.
Figure 1: Flow chart of participants.
Table 1: Demographic and physical characteristics of participants.
| Demographic and physical characteristics | Normal weight participants | Overweight participants | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TFWE | Placebo | p-value | TFWE | Placebo | p-value | |
| Sex | 0.896a | 0.333a | ||||
| Male | 8 | 9 | 4 | 7 | ||
| Female | 12 | 11 | 16 | 13 | ||
| Age (years) | 50.2±7.02 | 52.2±6.75 | 0.383b | 50.5±6.63 | 51.7±5.42 | 0.566b |
| Family history related to diabetes | 0.648a | 0.389a | ||||
| No | 13 | 10 | 13 | 11 | ||
| Yes | 7 | 10 | 7 | 9 | ||
| Allergic history | 0.957a | 0.957a | ||||
| No | 20 | 18 | 17 | 18 | ||
| Yes | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | ||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.27±1.600 | 22.42±1.996 | 0.800b | 28.03±1.727 | 27.75±1.441 | 0.933b |
| Blood pressures (mm Hg) | ||||||
| Systolic | 131.10±6.613 | 126.88±3.098 | 0.649b | 132.57±2.474 | 131.71±2.361 | 0.879b |
| Diastolic | 86.25±2.649 | 80.86±6.413 | 0.294b | 85.50±1.984 | 82.07±1.977 | 0.177b |
| FBS (mm/dL) | 107.70±6.967 | 108.06±4.684 | 0.856c | 110.53±6.979 | 107.80±4.514 | 0.154c |
| Body circumference (cm) | ||||||
| Arm | 27.45±2.665 | 26.78±2.881 | 0.460c | 29.79±2.371 | 31.40±2.644 | 0.053c |
| Waist | 78.20±7.142 | 80.39±8.479 | 0.394c | 90.68±8.486 | 93.70±7.937 | 0.226c |
| Hip | 94.75±6.189 | 91.83±5.328 | 0.130c | 102.11±8.164 | 104.10±5.964 | 0.387c |
| Thigh | 50.35±6.862 | 48.00±4.576 | 0.207c | 54.84±4.571 | 56.15±4.826 | 0.391c |
| Skinfold thickness (cm) | ||||||
| Chest | 46.07±3.280 | 45.16±2.818 | 0.365c | 46.20±2.050 | 47.21±2.783 | 0.208c |
| Abdomen | 45.95±2.395 | 46.24±3.354 | 0.764c | 46.66±2.249 | 47.67±2.910 | 0.236c |
| Suprailiac | 52.50±1.297 | 51.38±2.106 | 0.053c | 52.29±1.145 | 51.56±1.920 | 0.253c |
| Thigh | 47.74±3.313 | 46.87±3.298 | 0.421c | 49.84±3.016 | 48.69±3.167 | 0.162c |
| Triceps | 44.87±3.502 | 44.55±4.684 | 0.814c | 46.07±3.512 | 45.81±2.494 | 0.790c |
| Visceral fat level | 5.43±2.028 | 4.81±1.330 | 0.279c | 7.29±2.212 | 6.60±2.85 | 0.399c |
Values are presented as number or mean ± standard deviation.
Superscripted alphabets represent the data using different statistical analyzed methods. a indicates statistically analyzed using Pearson Chi-square, b indicates statistically analyzed using Mann-Whitney U Test and c indicates statistically analyzed using independent t-test.
Effect of TFWE on FBS levels of participants
The effects of TFWE on FBS levels in the normal weight range and overweight participants were evaluated pre and post of the intervention (Table 2). Results showed that normal weight participants who received TFWE or placebo showed a slight decrease in FBS levels through 8 weeks of the intervention period. However, they did not show a significantly difference (p>0.05) when compared within the group and between-groups.
Table 2: FBS levels of the normal weight range and the overweight participants after 8 weeks of intervention.
| Intervention period | FBS (mg/dL) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal weight participants | Overweight participants | |||||
| TWFE | Placebo | p-value2 | TWFE | Placebo | p-value2 | |
| 0 weeks | 107.7± 6.967 | 108.06± 4.684 | 0.856 | 110.53±6.979 | 107.80±4.514 | 0.154 |
| 4 weeks | 104.58±13.785 | 105.00±14.652 | 0.965 | 111.42±9.518 | 108.85±15.852 | 0.745 |
| 8 weeks | 105.45±12.534 | 106.37± 9.575 | 0.317 | 107.89±14.122 | 112.75±19.396 | 0.026* |
| p-value1 | 0.253 | 0.066 | 0.372 | 0.216 | ||
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation.
p-value1 indicates the intragroup statistically comparison using repeated measure ANOVA.
p-value2 indicates the intergroup statistically comparison using independent T-test.
* represents statistically significant difference (p< 0.05).
For overweight participants, the mean FBS levels of the participants in TFWE group gradually decreased while that of the placebo group showed an incremental trend. At week 8, the mean FBS levels of TFWE and placebo groups were different (p = 0.026).
Effect of TFWE on body circumferences and body fats
The BMI and body circumference of participants are shown in Table 3. The waist circumferences of normal weight participants in placebo group showed gradual increase which was significantly different from that of the TFWE group at week 8 (p = 0.028). In overweight participants receiving placebo, waist circumference significantly increased throughout the study period as compared to the waist circumference of participants receiving TFWE at week 8 (p = 0.027). The other circumferential measures of normal weight participants in the placebo group showed a reduction, while that of overweight participants in placebo group showed increase. However, these changes did not reach statistical significance.
Table 3: BMI and body circumferences of participants.
| Physical characteristics | Normal weight participants | Overweight participants | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TWFE | Placebo | p-value2 | TWFE | Placebo | p-value2 | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | ||||||
| 0 weeks | 22.27±1.600 | 22.42±1.996 | 0.800 | 28.03±1.727 | 27.75±1.441 | 0.933 |
| 4 weeks | 22.05±1.551 | 23.20±3.037 | 0.151 | 28.09±1.675 | 27.95±1.517 | 0.782 |
| 8 weeks | 22.16±1.665 | 23.61±3.482 | 0.227 | 27.88±1.638 | 28.28±1.605 | 0.441 |
| p-value1 | 0.655 | 0.680 | 0.453 | 0.052 | ||
| Body circumferences (cm) | ||||||
| Arm | ||||||
| 0 weeks | 27.45±2.665 | 26.78±2.881 | 0.460 | 28.03±1.727 | 27.75±1.441 | 0.933 |
| 4 weeks | 27.26±2.532 | 27.47±3.687 | 0.813 | 28.09±1.675 | 27.95±1.517 | 0.782 |
| 8 weeks | 27.20±1.824 | 28.16±4.298 | 0.798 | 27.88±1.638 | 28.28±1.605 | 0.441 |
| p-value1 | 0.976 | 0.462 | 0.453 | 0.052 | ||
| Waist | ||||||
| 0 weeks | 78.20±7.142 | 80.39± 8.479 | 0.394 | 90.68±8.486 | 93.70±6.759 | 0.226 |
| 4 weeks | 77.37±6.291 | 82.42±10.046 | 0.071 | 91.89±9.492 | 96.10±7.174 | 0.126 |
| 8 weeks | 77.15±5.896 | 84.00±11.991 | 0.028* | 91.00±9.129 | 97.10±7.297 | 0.027* |
| p-value1 | 0.495 | 0.554 | 0.367 | 0.000* | ||
| Hip | ||||||
| 0 weeks | 94.75±6.189 | 91.83±5.328 | 0.130 | 102.11±8.164 | 104.10±5.964 | 0.387 |
| 4 weeks | 93.37±6.166 | 93.32±6.532 | 0.977 | 102.11±8.164 | 103.90±5.920 | 0.416 |
| 8 weeks | 93.25±6.248 | 94.74±8.980 | 0.550 | 102.32±6.120 | 103.70±6.018 | 0.634 |
| p-value1 | 0.386 | 0.292 | 0.324 | 0.463 | ||
| Thigh | ||||||
| 0 weeks | 50.35±6.862 | 48.00±4.576 | 0.207 | 54.84±4.574 | 56.15±4.826 | 0.391 |
| 4 weeks | 48.79±6.885 | 48.16±5.134 | 0.758 | 54.00±4.282 | 56.00±4.600 | 0.169 |
| 8 weeks | 49.90±6.885 | 49.42±6.388 | 0.843 | 54.05±3.922 | 56.51±4.700 | 0.085 |
| p-value1 | 0.220 | 0.276 | 0.076 | 0.225 | ||
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation.
p-value1 indicates the intragroup statistically comparison using repeated measure ANOVA.
p-value2 indicates the intergroup statistically comparison using independent T-test.
* represents statistically significant difference (p< 0.05).
Table 4 shows the skinfold thicknesses and the visceral fat levels of participants. No statistically significant change was seen in skinfold thicknesses and visceral fat levels of normal weight participants. In contrast, the waist skinfold thicknesses (p = 0.008), arm skinfold thicknesses (p = 0.015) and the visceral fat level (p = 0.030) of participants in placebo group were significantly increased. The visceral fat level of participants in TFWE group were also significantly increased (p = 0.039).
Table 4: Skinfold thicknesses and visceral fat levels of participants.
| Body fat | Normal weight participants | Overweight participants | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TWFE | Placebo | p-value2 | TWFE | Placebo | p-value2 | |
| Skinfold thicknesses | ||||||
| Chest | ||||||
| 0 weeks | 46.07±3.280 | 45.16±2.818 | 0.365 | 46.20±2.050 | 47.21±2.783 | 0.208 |
| 4 weeks | 46.12±2.773 | 46.13±3.104 | 0.995 | 45.96±2.133 | 47.40±2.959 | 0.092 |
| 8 weeks | 46.45±2.940 | 46.32±3.290 | 0.388 | 46.16±2.196 | 47.51±2.991 | 0.119 |
| p-value1 | 0.237 | 0.378 | 0.857 | 0.296 | ||
| Abdomen | ||||||
| 0 weeks | 45.95±2.393 | 46.24±3.354 | 0.764 | 46.66±2.249 | 47.67±2.910 | 0.236 |
| 4 weeks | 46.07±2.473 | 46.70±3.556 | 0.530 | 46.17±2.163 | 47.52±2.799 | 0.101 |
| 8 weeks | 45.93±2.536 | 47.09±3.636 | 0.252 | 46.38±2.255 | 47.83±3.004 | 0.097 |
| p-value1 | 0.697 | 0.628 | 0.330 | 0.362 | ||
| Thigh | ||||||
| 0 weeks | 52.50±1.297 | 51.38±2.106 | 0.053 | 52.29±1.145 | 51.56±1.920 | 0.162 |
| 4 weeks | 51.13±1.265 | 51.15±1.713 | 0.054 | 51.81±0.894 | 51.70±1.932 | 0.824 |
| 8 weeks | 52.02±1.211 | 51.51±1.504 | 0.247 | 52.02±0.859 | 51.84±1.819 | 0.697 |
| p-value1 | 0.261 | 0.754 | 0.175 | 0.707 | ||
| Waist | ||||||
| 0 weeks | 47.74±3.313 | 46.87±3.298 | 0.421 | 49.84±3.016 | 48.69±3.167 | 0.253 |
| 4 weeks | 47.58±3.483 | 47.07±3.191 | 0.641 | 49.30±2.778 | 48.70±2.684 | 0.494 |
| 8 weeks | 47.81±3.290 | 47.40±3.381 | 0.701 | 49.70±2.546 | 49.27±2.881 | 0.632 |
| p-value1 | 0.978 | 0.757 | 0.153 | 0.008* | ||
| Arm | ||||||
| 0 weeks | 44.87±3.502 | 44.55±4.684 | 0.814 | 46.07±3.512 | 45.81±2.494 | 0.790 |
| 4 weeks | 44.60±2.802 | 44.24±4.555 | 0.776 | 45.72±3.307 | 45.92±2.551 | 0.829 |
| 8 weeks | 44.37±2.782 | 44.47±4.688 | 0.285 | 45.94±3.492 | 46.39±2.509 | 0.647 |
| p-value1 | 0.605 | 0.905 | 0.413 | 0.015* | ||
| Visceral fat levels | ||||||
| 0 weeks | 5.43±2.028 | 4.81±1.330 | 0.279 | 7.29±2.117 | 6.60±2.850 | 0.399 |
| 4 weeks | 5.21±1.939 | 5.63±2.773 | 0.988 | 7.32±2.063 | 6.60±2.813 | 0.373 |
| 8 weeks | 5.20±2.022 | 5.92±2.950 | 0.563 | 6.95±1.794 | 6.85±2.961 | 0.902 |
| p-value1 | 0.525 | 0.779 | 0.039* | 0.030* | ||
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation.
p-value1 indicates the intragroup statistically comparison using repeated measure ANOVA.
p-value2 indicates the intergroup statistically comparison using independent T-test.
* represents statistically significant difference (p< 0.05).
Adverse events of the TFWE intervention
There were no serious adverse events reported by any of the participants throughout the study. Results demonstrated that minor adverse events were found during 1st to 3rd day of intervention (Figure 2). Participants receiving TFWE reported minor adverse events such as diarrhea, flatulence, edema, headache and heartburn which were not different from that of the placebo group.
Figure 2: Adverse events reported by participants throughout the intervention.
DISCUSSION
The prevalence of T2D is closely related with the concomitant rise in obesity. Body circumferences and skinfold thickness changes leading to progression to obesity have a dramatic impact on metabolism and insulin sensitivity.[18] The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of TFWE on FBS levels and body fat in pre-diabetes subjects. We observed that TFWE was more effective to improve glycemic control in overweight subjects than normal weight subjects. This clinical FBS lowering activity of TFWE is accordance with previous studies that evaluated its hypoglycemic effect in experimentally-induced diabetic rats.[9,19] In addition, body shape and skinfold thickness have been mentioned as adiposity predictors of diabetes subjects.[20] Visceral fat levels of the overweight subjects receiving TFWE also showed a significant reduction compared to the placebo group that showed a gradual increase in waist circumference, waist skinfold thickness and visceral fat levels. TFWE intervention only showed some minor adverse events at the beginning of the treatment and is an indication of its safety.
The fruit of T. chebula contain hydrolyzable tannins and polyphenolics like punicalagin, chebulic acid, chebulagic acid, corilagin, gallic acid and galloyl derivatives.[21] Although, the mechanisms of action of TFWE bioactive compounds in mediating its benefits in hyperglycemic and overweight subjects have been not established, the favorable effects of polyphenolics on glucose and lipid metabolism have been shown in several studies.[22-25] TFWE had an inhibitory action on alpha-glucosidase and this prevents the digestion of carbohydrates resulting in intestinal absorption of glucose.[14] Chebulagic acid isolated from T. chebula fruit has been reported to have potent hypoglycemic effects in both in vitro enzymatic assays and animal models.[26,27] Some polyphenols have been reported to have an anti-obesity effect through inhibition of fat absorption from the intestine.[28] Gallic acid, a major phenolic compound of TFWE can delay cholesterol absorption and inhibit pancreatic lipase activity.[29] Chebulagic acid also exhibits the inhibition of adipogenesis.[26,30] The glycemic control and visceral fat reductive effects of TFWE observed in the present study may be attributed to these phenolic compounds. Our data indicated that TFWE has the potential to be used to prevent T2D and for the management of obesity, without serious adverse events.
CONCLUSION
In summary, the administration of 2,000 mg TFWE per day was considered to be safe for the pre-diabetic healthy subjects with potential benefits in the management of obesity.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors are highly thankful to Emeritus Professor P.T. Thomas for his diligent proofreading of this manuscript.
Financial Support
This research was financially supported by Mahasarakham University (Grant year 2021).
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
ABBREVIATIONS
BMI: Body mass index; FBS: Fasting blood sugar; HPLC: High-pressure liquid chromatography; IC50: Inhibition concentration at 50%; NCDs: Non-communicable diseases; pNPG: p-nitrophenyl-β-glucopyranoside; T2D: Type 2 diabetes; TFWE: Terminalia chebula fruit water extract.
SUMMARY
The water extract of Terminalia chebula Retz. (Combretaceae) fruit or TFWE was preliminary assessment for the glycemic control and body fat reduction effects on pre-diabetic subjects. Results of subgroup analysis indicated the mean FBS levels of overweight participants receiving TFWE 2,000 mg per day for 8 weeks were significantly lower than that of the placebo group. Visceral fat levels also showed a significant reduction with no serious adverse events reported. The administration of 2,000 mg TFWE per day was considered to be safe for the pre-diabetic healthy subjects with potential benefits in the management of obesity.
REFERENCES
1. World Health Organization. Non-communicable diseases country profiles 2018. World Health Organization; 2018 [cited 7/9/2021]. Available from: https://apps. who.int/iris/handle/10665/274512.
2. World Health Organization. Global action plan for the prevention and control of non-communicable diseases 2013-2020. World Health Organization; 2013 [cited 7/9/2021]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/94384.
3. Khan MAB, Hashim MJ, King JK, Govender RD, Mustafa H, Al Kaabi JAl. Epidemiology of Type 2 diabetes - Global burden of disease and forecasted trends. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2020;10(1):107-11. doi: 10.2991/jegh.k.191028.001, PMID 32175717.
4. Barnes AS. The epidemic of obesity and diabetes: Trends and treatments. Tex Heart Inst J. 2011;38(2):142-4. PMID 21494521.
5. Ratha KK, Joshi GC. Haritaki (Chebulic myrobalan) and its varieties. Ayu. 2013;34(3):331-4. doi: 10.4103/0974-8520.123139, PMID 24501534.
6. Chattopadhyay RR, Bhattacharyya SK. Terminalia chebula: An update. Pharmacogn Rev. 2007;1(1):151-6.
7. Upadhyay A, Agrahari P, Singh DK. A review on the pharmacological aspects of Terminalia chebula. Int J Pharmacol. 2014;10(6):289-98. doi: 10.3923/ijp.2014.289.298.
8. Bag A, Bhattacharyya SK, Chattopadhyay RR. The development of Terminalia chebula Retz. (Combretaceae) in clinical research. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2013;3(3):244-52. doi: 10.1016/S2221-1691(13)60059-3, PMID 23620847.
9. Murali YK, Chandra R, Murthy PS. Antihyperglycemic effect of water extract of dry fruits of Terminalia chebula in experimental diabetes mellitus. Indian J Clin Biochem. 2004;19(2):202-4. doi: 10.1007/BF02894285, PMID 23105484.
10. Murali YK, Anand P, Tandon V, Singh R, Chandra R, Murthy PS. Long-term effects of Terminalia chebula Retz. on hyperglycemia and associated hyperlipidemia, tissue glycogen content and in vitro release of insulin in streptozotocin induced diabetic rats. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2007;115(10):641-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-982500, PMID 18058598.
11. Borah A, Kuri P, Singh A, Saha S. Anti-adipogenic effect of Terminalia chebula fruit aqueous extract in 3T3-L1 preadipocytes. Phcog Mag. 2019;15(64):197-204. doi: 10.4103/pm.pm_108_19.
12. Sireeratawong S, Jaijoy K, Panunto W, Soonthornchareonnon N. Anti-inflammatory activity and toxicity of the water extract of Terminalia chebula Rezt in rats. Planta Med. 2012;78(11). doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1320799.
13. Panunto W, Jaijoy K. Acute and chronic toxicity studies of the water extract from dried fruits of Terminalia chebula Rezt. in rats. Int J Appl Res Nat Prod. 2010;3(4):36-43.
14. Mudjupa C, Rinthong PO. In vitro. 3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme: A reductase inhibition assay of triphala ayurvedic formulation. Pharmacogn Res. 2020;12(4):337-41.
15. Sasidharan I, Sundaresan A, Nisha VM, Kirishna MS, Raghu KG, Jayamurthy P. Inhibitory effect of Terminalia chebula Retz. fruit extracts on digestive enzyme related to diabetes and oxidative stress. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem. 2012;27(4):578-86. doi: 10.3109/14756366.2011.603130, PMID 22512724.
16. The United States pharmacopeia. National formulary. Rockville (MD): United States Pharmacopeial Convention; 2017.
17. Nair AB, Jacob S. A simple practice guide for dose conversion between animals and human. J Basic Clin Pharm. 2016;7(2):27-31. doi: 10.4103/0976-0105.177703, PMID 27057123.
18. Duren DL, Sherwood RJ, Czerwinski SA, Lee M, Choh AC, Siervogel RM, et al. Body composition methods: comparisons and interpretation. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2008;2(6):1139-46. doi: 10.1177/193229680800200623, PMID 19885303.
19. Aung E, Lwin S, Aye NN, Phyu K. Hypoglycemic Effect of Terminalia chebula Retz. fruit on alloxan-induced diabetic rats. 2017;69(2):80-4.
20. Surendar J, Indulekha K, Deepa M, Mohan V, Pradeepa R. Association of adiposity, measured by skinfold thickness, with parental history of diabetes in a South Indian population: Data from CURES-114. Postgrad Med J. 2016;92(1089):379-85. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2015-133363, PMID 26917700.
21. Pellati F, Bruni R, Righi D, Grandini A, Tognolini M, Pio Prencipe F, et al. Metabolite profiling of polyphenols in a Terminalia chebula Retzius ayurvedic decoction and evaluation of its chemopreventive activity. J Ethnopharmacol. 2013;147(2):277-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2013.02.025, PMID 23506992.
22. Ríos JL, Francini F, Schinella GR. Natural products for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Planta Med. 2015;81(12-13):975-94. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1546131, PMID 26132858.
23. Lin D, Xiao M, Zhao J, Li Z, Xing B, Li X, et al. An overview of plant phenolic compounds and their importance in human nutrition and management of type 2 diabetes. Molecules. 2016;21(10):1374. doi: 10.3390/molecules21101374, PMID 27754463.
24. Rodríguez-Pérez C, Segura-Carretero A, Del Mar Contreras M. Phenolic compounds as natural and multifunctional anti-obesity agents: a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2019;59(8):1212-29. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2017.1399859, PMID 29156939.
25. Toma L, Sanda GM, Niculescu LS, Deleanu M, Sima AV, Stancu CS. Phenolic compounds exerting lipid-regulatory, anti-inflammatory and epigenetic effects as complementary treatments in cardiovascular diseases. Biomolecules. 2020;10(4). doi: 10.3390/biom10040641, PMID 32326376.
26. Huang YN, Zhao DD, Gao B, Zhong K, Zhu RX, Zhang Y, et al. Anti-hyperglycemic effect of chebulagic acid from the fruits of Terminalia chebula Retz. Int J Mol Sci. 2012;13(5):6320-33. doi: 10.3390/ijms13056320, PMID 22754367.
27. Gao H, Huang YN, Gao B, Kawabata J. Chebulagic acid is a potent α-glucosidase inhibitor. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2008;72(2):601-3. doi: 10.1271/bbb.70591, PMID 18256469.
28. Mcdougall GJ, Stewart D. The inhibitory effects of berry polyphenols on digestive enzymes. BioFactors. 2005;23(4):189-95. doi: 10.1002/biof.5520230403, PMID 16498205.
29. Ngamukote S, Mäkynen K, Thilawech T, Adisakwattana S. Cholesterol-lowering activity of the major polyphenols in grape seed. Molecules. 2011;16(6):5054-61. doi: 10.3390/molecules16065054, PMID 21694670.
30. Gao H, Huang YN, Xu PY, Kawabata J. Inhibitory effect on α-glucosidase by the fruits of Terminalia chebula Retz. Food Chem. 2007;105(2):628-34. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.04.023.
Cite this article: Sombattera S, Sungthong B, Rinthong P. Preliminary Assessment of Glycemic Control and Body Fat Reduction Effects of Terminalia chebula Retz. Extract on Pre-diabetic Subjects. Pharmacog Res. 2022;14(1):5-11.